"AFTER EASTER" IN ACTS 12:4
By John Henry
ACTS 12:1- 4: "Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his
hands to vex certain of the church. And he killed James the brother of
John with the sword. And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded
further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) And
when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four
quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him
forth to the people."
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Etymology, History & Biblical Background Of Easter
Herod's Background & The Easter Of Acts Chapter Twelve
The Text Forbids This Pasach From Being God’s Passover
The Timing Of Herod's Easter & What It Really Was
Peter's Escape & Herod's Resulting Anger
"Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth." (1 Corinthians 5:7-8)
"But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming." (1 Corinthians 15:20-23)
"Old English (OE), Easterdæg [Easter day], from Eastre (Northumbrian Eostre), from Proto-Germanic (PGmc) Austron, a goddess of fertility and spring, probably originally of sunrise whose feast was celebrated at the spring equinox, from austra-, from Proto-Indo-Europea (PIE) aus- "to shine" (especially of the dawn). Bede says Anglo-Saxon Christians adopted her name and many of the celebratory practices for their Mass of Christ's resurrection. Ultimately related to east. Almost all neighboring languages use a variant of Latin Pasche to name this holiday. ..." (Online Etymology Dictionary)
"In olden times the English people ... calculated their months
according to the course of the Moon. Hence, after the manner of the
Greeks and the Romans, [the months] take their name from the Moon, for
the moon is called mona and each month monath. The first month,
which the Latins call January, is Giuli; February is called Solmonath;
March Hrethmonath; April, Eosturmonath [... etc.].
Eosturmonath has a name which is now translated 'Paschal
month', and which was once called after a goddess of theirs named
Eostre, in whose honour feasts were celebrated in that month. Now
they designate that Paschal season by her name, calling the joys
of the new rite by the time-honoured name of the old observance."
[3]
The symbols of Easter too are pagan to the core.
The rabbit and the egg fertility symbols which are found in the mystery
religions. The hare and the egg were symbols of the ancient German
goddess, Ostara. Ostara is identical to the Greek Eos and the Roman
Aurora. Both the rabbit and the egg represented fertility.
The ancient Babylonians believed that a giant egg fell from heaven into
the Euphrates River and from it the goddess Ishtar was hatched. The
Easter egg is a symbol of the false goddess. The fable of this
mythological egg spread from Babylon to Rome where it preceded
processions in honor of the great mother goddess. The egg was part
of the sacred ceremonies of the Mysteries of Bacchus. The Druids also
used the egg as their sacred emblem.
[31]
Dated: April 2, 2007
Updated: June 11, 2012
Astarte Coin photos added August 8, 2012
T. H. Brown explains the difficulty involved in the translation of
the Hebrew word "pesach" (Passover) into Greek, Latin
and then into English: "This single occurrence of
Easter in the Authorised Version as a translation of the Greek
pascha, ‘passover’, is an interesting reminder of the problems
which have confronted translators of the Holy Scriptures for many
centuries. When the scholars ... translated the Hebrew into Greek ...
they could find in the Greek language no precise equivalent for the
Hebrew pesach, and they decided to adopt the Hebrew word in a
Greek form. When the Bible was first translated into Latin the same
course was followed, and the Greek pascha was adopted without
translation. Centuries later, [in 1382] when Wycliffe translated
the Bible into English from the Latin version, he could find in the
English language no satisfactory equivalent, so he just gave the Latin
word an English form -- pask or paske. ... [Then in 1526
when] Tyndale applied his talents to the translation of the New Testament
from Greek into English, he was not satisfied with the use of a
completely foreign word, and decided to take into account the fact that
the season of the passover was known generally to English people as
'Easter', notwithstanding the lack of any actual connection between the
meanings of the two words. The Greek word occurs twenty-nine times in
the New Testament, and Tyndale has ester or easter fourteen
times, esterlambe eleven times, esterfest once, and
paschall lambe three times. ... When Tyndale began his translation
of the Pentateuch he was again faced with the problem in Exodus 12.11 and
twenty-one other places, and no doubt recognising that easter in
this context would be an anachronism he coined a new word,
passover, and used it consistently in all twenty-two places. It is
therefore to Tyndale that our language is indebted for this meaningful
and appropriate word. His labours on the Old Testament left little time
for revision of the New Testament, with the result that while
passover is found in his 1530 Pentateuch, ester remained in
the N.T. of 1534, having been used in his first edition several years
before he coined the new word passover."
[2]
Brown erroneously states, "... it seems probable that
[Easter] was left inadvertently rather than intentionally, in Acts
12.4." [2] Even humanly
speaking, it would have been extremely unlikely that "Easter"
in Acts 12:4 would have been an inadvertent mistake, let alone the divine
providence of God superintending His Word. This is true because the
translators diligently compared their translation of the Greek with the
former English translations. The title page of the New Testament of 1611
says: "The Newe Testament of our Lord and Saviour JESUS
CHRIST. Newly Translated out of the Originall Greeke: and with the former
Translations diligently compared and revised, by his Majesties speciall
Commandment." They compared their KJV translation
with the translations that had the word "Easter" in Acts
12:4: i.e Tyndale's Bible (1534) the Great Bible (1539) and the
Bishop's Bible (1568); and to those which did not have it: i.e
Wycliffe's Bible (1382) and the Geneva Bible (1560). There
were 47 translators of the KJV organized into six groups, who met
respectively at Westminster, Cambridge, and Oxford. Eight of the fifteen
men in the Oxford group worked on Acts. There were fifteen general rules
that were advanced for the guidance of the translators. One of the rules
was: "The ordinary Bible read in the Church, commonly called the
Bishops Bible, to be followed, and as little altered as the Truth of the
original will permit." The Bishops Bible had already
eliminated all but 2 instances (John 11:55 and Acts 12:4) of the many
places where the Tyndale and Great bibles had retained the word
"Easter." The KJV translators further eliminated John
11:55, but retained it in Acts 12:4. Other rules of translation
stated, "Every particular Man of each Company, to take the same
Chapter or Chapters, and having translated or amended them severally by
himself, where he thinketh good, all to meet together, confer what they
have done, and agree for their Parts what shall stand. ... As any one
Company hath dispatched any one Book in this Manner they shall send it to
the rest, to be considered of seriously and judiciously, for His Majesty
is very careful in this Point." So the word
"Easter" in Acts 12:4 was translated by eight men and the
translation agreed upon by the eight and then sent to be checked by the
other 39 translators from all six translation groups. Therefore, it
would have been next to impossible to have "inadvertently" left
"Easter" in Acts 12:4, and with God's providential hand guiding
in the translation it was totally impossible (John 16:13-14; 1 Cor 2:12).
The Greek transliteration of the Hebrew, "Pashca" is
found 29 times in the Greek New Testament. In the King
James Bible it is translated "Passover" 28 times, and in
Acts 12:4 it is correctly translated "Easter," because it
is not referring to the Jewish Passover, but rather to a pagan
festival that occurred sometime after the Hebrew Passover.
ETYMOLOGY, HISTORY AND BIBLICAL BACKGROUND OF THE WORD EASTER :
Etymology of Easter:
Thanks to William Tyndale we have both the word Passover and an
etymological link to the meaning of Easter in Acts 12:4. Tyndale was the
first to translate Pashca as "ester" in 1526 when he translated
the New Testament, and then just 4 years later in 1530 he invented the
literal translation, "Passover," for his work in the Old
Testament. He left the transliteration, "paschall", in
Matthew 26:17 and John 18:28 in his 1534 New Testament revision.
Whether he intended it or not, these two places serve as reference points
in the etymology of the word to help us differentiate between God's
Passover and the pagan Easter of Acts 12:4. The subsequent
translations (Coverdale [1535], Matthews [1537], Great Bible [1539],
Geneva Bible [1560], Bishop's Bible [1568]) begin to remove
"easter" until only 85 years later the only place it was left
was in Acts 12:4. Tyndale's first use of "ester" was
necessary in the etymology of the word to help us see more clearly that
the Acts 12:4 "easter" was not a Hebrew Passover. Now we
have a perfect Bible, the 1611 KJV. Those that proceeded it
prepared the language and paved the way for the perfect English Bible.
Now note the words of the ancient historian, Bede (672 - 735 AD):
In his book, Teutonic Mythology, the 19th Century German scholar, Jacob Grimm (1785-1863), wrote expanding on Bede's brief reference to Eosturmonath and Eostre:
"The two goddesses, whom Beda (De temporum ratione cap. 13) cites very briefly, without any description, merely to explain the months named after them, are Hrede and Eástre, March taking its Saxon name from the first, and April from the second ... It would be uncritical to saddle this father of the church, who everywhere keeps heathenism at a distance, and tells us less of it than he knows, with the invention of these goddesses. There is nothing improbable in them, nay the first of them is justified by clear traces in the vocabularies of other German tribes. ... We Germans to this day call April ostermonat, and ôstarmânoth is found as early as Eginhart [775 - 840 AD]. ... The great christian festival, which usually falls in April or the end of March, bears in the oldest of OHG [Old High German] remains the name ôstarâ ... it is mostly found in the plural, because two days (ostartaga, aostortaga ...) were kept at Easter. This Ostarâ, like the AS [Anglo-Saxon] Eástre, must in heathen religion have denoted a higher being, whose worship was so firmly rooted, that the christian teachers tolerated the name, and applied it to one of their own grandest anniversaries. All the nations bordering on us have retained the Biblical pascha ... The OHG. adv. ostar expresses movement toward the rising sun ... Ostara, Eastre seems therefore to have been the divinity of the radiant dawn, of upspringing light, a spectacle that brings joy and blessing, whose meaning could be easily adapted to the resurrection-day of the Christian's God. Bonfires were lighted at Easter, and according to a popular belief of long standing, the moment the sun rises on Easter Sunday morning, he gives three joyful leaps, he dances for joy ... [H]eathen notions seems to have grafted themselves on great Christian festivals." [Vol. I, pp. 289-291, 1882]
"On April 21, the day of her founding, Rome kept the palilia, an ancient feast of herdsmen, in honour of Pales, a motherly divinity reminding us of Ceres and Vesta. This date does not coincide with the solstice, but it does with the time of the Easter fire; the ritual itself, the leaping over the flame, the driving of cattle through the glowing embers, is quite the same as at the Midsummer fire and needfire. ... The shepherds had struck the fire out of stone, and caught it on straw; the leaping through it was to atone and cleanse, and to secure their flock against all harm. ... This fire-worship seems equally at home in Canaan, Syria, Greece and Rome, so that we are not justified in pronouncing it a borrowed and imported thing in any one of them. It is therefore hard to determine from what source the Christians afterwards drew, when they came to use it in their Easter and Midsummer festivals, or on other occasions." (Vol. II, pp. 625-626, 1883)
Historian James A. Wylie (1808-1890) states, "The wife of Baal
was named Beltis, which is the feminine form of the word. She was the
Rhea of the Assyrians, the Istar of the Persians, the Astarte and
Ashtaroth of the Syrians and Phoenicians, the Venus of the Greeks and
Romans. Her worship was widely prevalent. The Jews at times offered cakes
to her as the 'Queen of Heaven'."
[4]
The New Unger's Bible Dictionary defines Easter thusly:
"Easter [Gk. pascha, from Heb. pesah]. The Passover ..., and
so translated in every passage except the KJV: 'intending after
Easter to bring him forth to the people' [Acts 12:4]. In the
earlier English versions Easter had been frequently used as the
translation of pascha. At the last revision [1611 A.V.] Passover was
substituted in all passages but this. ... The word Easter is of Saxon
origin, the name is eastra, the goddess of spring in whose honor
sacrifices were offered about Passover time each year. By the eighth
century Anglo-Saxons had adopted the name to designate the celebration of
Christ's resurrection."
The word was originally used because it identified the general time of
year of the Lord's Passover (Ex 12:27; Lev 23:5) which coincided with the
pagan festival of eastra. The Lord's Passover pointed
to the Lord Jesus Christ's death. The pagan passover of Acts 12:4 pointed
to an ancient pagan goddess.
There are legends of the goddess and springtime festivals all over the
world having to do with fertility. They all have their origins in
ancient Babel and are counterfeits and perversions of the Lord's
Passover.
The word "Easter" is a corruption of the word Ishtar and has
it's origin in the pagan worship of the false goddesses of an ancient
fertility cult. In the Bible she is known as "Ashtaroth"
and "Ashtoreth" (Ishtar to the Assyrians and Babylonians,
Astarte of the Greeks and Romans). All originate from the same
mythology. Easter is cognate with the goddesses of the Canaanites
referred to as Ashtaroth (Judges 2:13, 10:6; 1 Samuel 7:3-4,
12:10, 31:10), and under the name Ashtoreth of the Zidonians (1
Kings 11:5, 33; 2 Kings 23:13). She is mentioned in the Bible along
with other false gods such as Baal, Chemosh, Milcom and Molech.
Ashtaroth, Ashtoreth,
Ishtar, Astarte, Venus, Easter and
others are all cognate false goddess under different names. All
their names have the same meaning, "star."
[5] Ashtoreth is the
consort of Baal and is associated with him in Scripture and in
history. Angels are symbolized in Scripture as “stars.” In
Job 38 it says, “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth
… When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God
shouted for joy?” (Job 38:4, 7), and speaking of Satan’s angels who
rebelled with him it says this in Revelation 12:4, “And his tail drew the
third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth
…” Easter and the other names she goes by are names that represents
a fallen angel or angels and there are no female angels, so that makes
him or them queer. He is of the like kind that Jude wrote of where
he says, “And the angels which kept not their first estate, but
left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under
darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and
Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves
over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an
example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.” (Jude 6-7) They
are succubuses likened unto Sodomites. They help fulfill the
Apostle Paul’s prophecy that says, “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly,
that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to
seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils” (1 Tim 4:1; cf Mark 13:22; 1
John 2:22-26; Rev 2:20).
In Old Testament times her image was worshipped in
"groves" (Hebrew: Asherah; Strong's #842). The
prophets of the groves were false prophets of the places of worship of
Ashtoreth of the Zidonians. There were four hundred
"prophets of the groves" which ate at Jezebels table (1
Kings 18:19). The Bible says that King Ahab took Jezebel the
daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians as his wife, and made a
grove. Because of this and other abominable acts, Ahab
provoked the Lord God of Israel to anger more than all the kings of
Israel that were before him. (1 Kings 16:31-33) And like the
"prophets of the groves" and the Baal (Bel) worshipers of
Elijah’s day, Patrick likewise found in 4th century Ireland Druidic
priests who worshiped Bel and who were called “priests of the
groves." [4] The consort of the
Druidic Bel was Belisama (meaning: most brilliant).
Easter is the Biblical Ashtoreth and Diana (Artemis) and in other
cultures she was known as Astarte, Ostera, Isis, Venus, Rhea, Eos, etc.,
the fertility goddess, and mother goddess. Alexander Hislop says
this about Easter: "Easter is nothing else than Astarte, ... ,
the queen of heaven (Jeremiah 7:18, 44:17-19, 25), whose name, as
pronounced by the people of Nineveh, was evidently identical with that
now in common use in this country [Britain]. That name as found ...
on the Assyrian monuments, is Ishtar. The worship of Bel and
Astarte was very early introduced into Britain, along with the Druids,
'the priests of the groves' [1 Kings 18:19] ... From Bel, the 1st of May
is still called Beltane in the Almanac [Oliver & Boyd's Edinburgh
Almanac, 1860], and we have customs still lingering ... which prove how
exactly the worship of Bel or Moloch (for both ... [are] the same god)
[Jer 19:5] ... had been observed [including burnt human sacrifices]
..." If Baal was thus worshipped in Britain, it will not be
difficult to believe that his consort Astarte was also adorned by our
ancestors ... [April being called by] our Pagan ancestors ... Easter
monath. ... The forty days' of abstinence of Lent was directly borrowed
from the worshippers of the Babylonian goddess. Such a Lent of
forty days, 'in the spring ...' is still observed by ... Pagan
Devil-worshippers of Koordistan, who inherited it from ... the
Babylonians. ... About the end of the sixth century, the first decisive
attempt was made to enforce the observance of [a forty day Easter Lent by
Rome] ... [In Britain] the attempt met with vigorous resistance. The
difference ... as observed in Britain by the native Christians, and the
Pagan Easter enforced by Rome ... was a whole month; and it was only by
violence and bloodshed ... that the Festival of the Anglo-Saxon or
Chaldean goddess came to supercede that which had been held in honor of
Christ. Such is the history of Easter."
[6]
The Hebrew word pascha, for passover, came to be associated with both
Christian and pagan observance. It was to this latter that Herod
was referring in Acts 12. Clearly the pagan goddess Easter (Ishtar) has
no part in the celebration of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus
Christ.
HEROD'S BACKGROUND & THE EASTER OF ACTS CHAPTER TWELVE :
The Herods of the Bible were Edomites, not Israelites. The
Herod of Acts 12 was Herod Agrippa I. He was half brother of
Herodias, who had her daughter asked for John the Baptist's head (Mark
6:22-25). He was educated in Rome with Drusus, the son of Emperor
Tiberius. Herod was politically minded and sought alliances in Rome
to undermine his half brother, Herod the tetrarch. He gained the
favor of Gaius (later known as Caligula), and when he became emperor, he
made Agrippa I King of the provinces of Syria, and Abilene in 37 AD, and
in 39 AD he gained Galilee, and later Judaea and Samaria in 41 AD.
He died in 44 AD at Caesarea at age 44, being "eaten of worms"
after accepting divine acclamation and honor from the people (Acts
12:21-23). [7]
Herod Agrippa I, as an Edomite, was surely familiar with the gods of
his ancestral land [8] the pagan areas of
his kingdom, and those of the surrounding countries. This whole
area was inundated with Astarte worshiped before, during and after his
reign. From his youth on, he would most certainly have been well
acquainted with Astarte worship. He would have known of her from the many
years he spent in Rome where she was also worshiped. There can be no
question that many of her devotees were among the subjects of his kingdom
(Syria, Abilene, Samaria, Galilee, Judaea). Furthermore, his resort
in Caesarea was less than 80 miles from Sidon which was a major center of
Astarte worship both before and after those days.
On the coins of Caesarea dating mostly from the second and third
centuries, are found the names of many gods: Zeus, Poseidon, Apollo,
Hercules, Dionysus, Athena, Nike, and especially the Phenician goddess
Astarte. [9] There are also coins of
Caesarea with Agrippa's head on one side and Tyche (probably Astarte) on
the reverse.
It is interesting to note that "Ashtoreth" was "the
goddess of the Zidonians" (1 Kings 11:5, 33; 2 Kings. 23:13).
It was to Caesarea that Herod retreated after the Angel freed Peter (Acts
12:6-10, 19). Caesarea is only 80 miles from Sidon or Zidon, and
less than 20 miles from Mount Carmel where Elijah defeated 450
"prophets of Baal" and 400 "prophets of the groves"
in the days of King Ahab and Jezebel in a contest to see whose God was
greatest. Jezebel was from Sidon and Baal and Ashtoreth were her
gods. The Bible says: "... Ahab the son of Omri did evil in
the sight of the LORD above all that were before him. And it came
to pass ... that he took to wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of
the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshipped him. And he
reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in
Samaria. ... [The] prophets of Baal ... and the prophets of the groves
... eat at Jezebel's table." (1 Kings 16:30-32, 18:19) The
prophets of the "groves" (asherah) were prophets of Ashtoreth
the goddess of the Zidonians, consort of Baal, whose idol was worshipped
in the groves.
It is very interesting that Ishtar, Easter or Astarte are called
"Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians" in the Bible (1 Kings
11:5, 33; 2 Kings 23:13). The name "Easter" comes from
this same pagan star goddess. She was introduced into the British
Isles by the Druids as Eastre. In other cultures she was known as
Eostre, Ostera, Isis, Venus, etc., the fertility goddess, the queen of
heaven.
There can be no doubt that Herod was familiar with the false star goddess
called variously, Ashtoreth in the Bible, Ishtar by the Babylonians,
Astarte by the Zidonians, and Venus by the Romans. All these names
and others carry the same meaning, star.
[5]
THE TEXT FORBIDS THIS PASACH FROM BEING THE HEBREW PASSOVER:
Acts 12:1-4: "Now about that time Herod the king
stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. And he
killed James the brother of John with the sword. And because
he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take
Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him
to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter
to bring him forth to the people."
If Herod was himself a devotee of Astarte the text does not say, although
he may well have been. But as a politician just as he wanted
to please the Jews (Acts 12:3), he would have likewise have wanted to
please the pagans of his kingdom. Ecumenicalism and religious
duplicity has long been a common political tactic. This is probably what
the Lord Jesus meant when He said, "Take heed, beware ... of the
leaven of Herod" (Mark 8:15). Herod Agrippa I pleased the Jews
using the pretense of their religion, while at the same time showing
favor to the pagan religious rites of Ishtar / Astarte. It was his
political expertise, not Judaism, that led him to "vex certain of
the church" and "to take Peter" (Acts 12:1-3). It
was "because he saw it pleased the Jews" (Acts 12:3).
This phrase, "he saw it pleased the Jews," itself implies that
Herod was not himself a Jew. One thing is certain, no religious Jew
would accept praise as a god as he did (Acts 12:21-23).
Some assert that "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is synonymous
with "Passover" in English, but Herod could not have
been waiting till after "the LORD'S Passover" (Ex 12:11, 27;
Lev 23:5) to "bring [Peter] forth to the people" (Acts 12:4),
because Passover had already passed and they were already in "the
days of unleavened bread" (Acts 12:3). The feast of unleavened
bread is the second, after Passover, of the seven annual feasts of
Israel. Even though the days of unleavened bread follow directly
after Passover they are still two distinct feasts, and nowhere in the
King James Bible is that second feast called Passover. Both the
whole tenor of Scriptures and the context of the passage forbid it being
the Hebrew Passover. Therefore, Herod was waiting until "after
Easter," not till after the Hebrew Passover, to bring Peter forth to
the people (Acts 12:4).
Now notice carefully that "the days [plural] of unleavened
bread" (Acts 12:3) come after "the day [singular] of
unleavened bread, when the passover must be killed" (Luke 22:7; cf.
Ex 12:5-8). The day of unleavened bread or "Passover" is
observed on the 14th day of the first month (Abib or Nisan) of the Hebrew
calendar (Lev 23:5; Ex 12:5-6; Num 9:5, 28:16), whereas the seven
day "Feast of Unleavened Bread" is observed from the 15th to
the 21st of the first month of the Hebrew calendar (Lev 23:6; Ex 34:18;
Num 28:17; 2 Chron 30:21, 35:17). The two feasts were
different. Passover was a family feast whereas the Feast of
Unleavened Bread was one of three annual convocations (assemblies)
commanded by God. The Bible says, "Three times in a year shall
all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall
choose; in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and
in the feast of tabernacles ..." (Deut 16:16; cf 2 Chron
8:13). And it is not insignificant that there are 7 feasts (7 being
the number of perfection) which if Passover and Unleavened Bread were
combined would reduced them to just 6. Neither does the argument
that Jews use the terms "passover" and "the days of
unleavened bread" interchangeably hold Scriptural water.
Unleavened Bread may have come to be called Passover by the Jews, but the
Word of God clearly separates the two feasts. The Bible is precise
in Acts 12:3-4 and else where on this issue for a reason. It is to
show that it is not the Jewish Passover. The fact that the Bible
never calls "the Feast of Unleavened Bread" Passover cannot be
over emphasized. Passover is called unleavened bread (Matt 26:17;
Mark 14:12; Luke 22:1, 22:7; Ex 12:18), but nowhere in Scripture is the
Feast of Unleavened Bread called Passover. Although Jews do call the
whole eight days passover, this terminology is not Scriptural.
Passover is a feast distinct from and before the Unleavened Bread, and
Passover in the context of Acts 12:3-4 had already passed.
Therefore, it is clear that the Easter of Acts 12:4 cannot be the Jewish
Passover, because it comes after rather that before the Feast of
Unleavened Bread. Therefore, Herod was waiting for a pagan
"pascha" (1 Sam. 7:3; 1 Kings 11:5, 33; 2 Kings. 23:13; Jer.
7:18; 44:18), rather than the Lord's "pascha" (Ex 12:27; Lev
23:5).
THE TIMING OF HEROD'S EASTER AND WHAT IT REALLY WAS :
The question arises, if the pesach of Acts 12:4 was not the Hebrew
Passover then what and when was the "after Easter" of Acts
12:4? In Ezekiel 8 God showed Ezekiel the great abominations that
were being committed by the house of Israel (v. 6). One of those
abominations was the worship of Tammuz. Ezekiel 8:14 says, "Then
he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD'S house which was
toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for
Tammuz." This is a direct reference to Pagan Babylonian
mythology which is the basis of their religion. Who was this
Tammuz? Jerome (340 - 420 AD) in his Commentary on Ezekiel
wrote: "Hence as, according to the Pagan legend, the lover of
Venus, a most beautiful youth, is said to have been slain, then
raised to life again, in the month of June, they [both Babylonians
and Jews] call the month of June by his name, and they have a
solemn celebration in it every year, in the course of which his death is
mourned by the women, and afterwards his resurrection is chanted, and
praised." [10] Alexander Hislop
further states: "... the great annual festival in commemoration of
the death and resurrection of Tammuz, which was celebrated by alternate
weeping and rejoicing, and which, in many countries, was considerably
later than the Christian festival, being observed in Palestine and
Assyria in June, therefore called the 'month of Tammuz'; in
Egypt, about the middle of May, and in Britain, some time in
April." [11] Moshe ben Maimon
(1135 -1204 AD) who was well studied in the sacred books of the Chaldeans
gives the following account of the death of Tammuz: "When
the false prophet named Thammuz preached to a certain king that he should
worship the seven stars and the twelve signs of the Zodiac, that king
ordered him to be put to a terrible death. On the night of his death all
the images assembled from the ends of the earth into the temple of
Babylon, to the great golden image of the Sun, which was suspended
between heaven and earth. That image prostrated itself in the midst of
the temple, and so did all the images around it, while it related to them
all that had happened to Thammuz. The images wept and lamented all the
night long, and then in the morning they flew away, each to his own
temple again, to the ends of the earth. And hence arose the custom
every year, on the first day of the month Thammuz, to mourn and to weep
for Thammuz." [12,
13] The extravagant Chaldean
idolatry quoted in this passage is no reason to doubt the fact of the
death of the historical Tammuz. There is reason to believe that the
"certain king" in this Chaldean legend who had the false
prophet put to death was Noah's son, Shem.
But how does this date, the first day of the month Thammuz, tie into
Ishtar or Easter worship? All false religions have a common source
that will culminate in the prophetic universal religion spoken of in the
Book of Revelation. There it speaks of "MYSTERY, BABYLON
THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH"
(Rev 17:5). [14] This Babylonian
Mother of harlots and abominations originated in ancient Babel (from
which Babylon derives its name) about 470 years after the Great Flood, in
the last decades of Shem's life. This the original mystery religion
was organized by Noah's great grandson, Nimrod, and his wife,
Semiramis, at the tower of Babel. Nimrod was the original
antichrist (Anti means both, against and in place of). The
Bible says this concerning him: "... Nimrod ... was a mighty hunter
before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter
before the LORD. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and
Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar." (Gen
10:9-10). The name Nimrod itself means rebel. The
ancient Jerusalem Targum says: He was powerful in
hunting and wickedness before the Lord, for he was a hunter of the sons
of men, and he said to them, Depart from the judgment of the Lord, and
adhere to the judgment of Nimrod! Therefore it is said: As Nimrod
the strong one, strong in hunting, and wickedness before the Lord.
[15] He was a rebel before the Lord
who sought to draw men away from Almighty Jehovah God. This
apostate tried to unite all the people of the world into a great
antichrist religion with himself and Semiramis at its head. At that
time "the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech"
(Gen 11:1). However, God frustrated this One World Religion by
confounding their language so that the people could not understand one
another’s speech (Gen 11:5). "So the LORD scattered them
abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth" (Gen 11:8).
The Bible is silent concerning Nimrod's death and profane history only
speaks mysteriously of it, but apparently sometime prior to the
confounding of tongues Nimrod died and Tammuz was born, because it was
from Babel that went forth to all corners of the earth the mythology of
his
reincarnation as his wife's son through a miraculous
birth. Hislop says, "... Nimrod, under the name of Ninus, was
worshipped as the son [Tammuz] of his wife [Semiramis], when he came to
be deified as the sun-god. [The] name Aurora, as applied to his
wife, is evidently intended to convey the very same idea as prevails in
Tartary. ... These myths of the Tartars ... prove that the Pagan idea of
the miraculous conception had ... [come] directly from the promise of
'the seed of the woman'."
[16] Eusbe Salverte (1771-1839)
speaks of the mythology of the Scythians [Tartary] on this wise,
"Almost all the Tartar princes trace their genealogy to a celestial
virgin, impregnated by a sun-beam, or some equally miraculous
means." [17] The ancients knew
God's prophesy of judgment upon Satan for deceiving Eve. God told
him, "I will put enmity between thee [Satan] and
the woman [Eve, Israel & Mary], and between thy seed
[the unregenerate lost] and her seed [Christ Jesus
& those in Christ]; it shall bruise thy head [overcome
Satan], and thou shalt bruise his heel [at Calvary]"
(Gen 3:15). Semiramis twisted the prophecy of Genesis 3:15 to her
own advantage. [18] According to
the cult of Ishtar, Tammuz was conceived by a sunbeam, a counterfeit of
the Lord Jesus' virgin birth. Hislop further states, "The
Chaldean Mysteries can be traced up to the days of Semiramis, who ... it
is well known, was worshipped by the Babylonians. ... It was from the son
[Tammuz], however, that she derived all her glory and her claims to
deification. That son, though represented as a child in his
mother's arms, was a person of great stature. ... In Scripture he is
referred to under the name of Tammuz (Ezek 8:14), but he is commonly
known among classical writers under the name of Bacchus, that is, 'The
Lamented one.' ... From Bakhah 'to weep' or 'lament.' Among the
Phoenicians [including Sidonians], ... 'Bacchos means weeping.' As
the women wept for Tammuz, so did they for Bacchus. ..."
[19] Semiramis who is called Ishtar
is described in an ancient Babylonian text, The Descent of Ishtar
(about 2000 BC), as having descended with great determination
into the neither world to bring Tammuz up from "the Land of
no Return." His sister, Geshtinanna [meaning: She who
always weeps], and Ishtar mourn his death, and Geshtinanna pleaded with
Ishtar to bring him back to life. That ancient text says,
"Ishtar ... set her mind ... to the dark house, the abode of Irkalla
[queen of the under world], to the house which none leave who have
entered it. ... (Where) they see no light. ... When Ishtar reached the
gate of the Land of no Return, She said, ... 'O gatekeeper, open thy gate
... that I may enter! If thou openest not the gate so that I can-not
enter, I will smash the door ..." This myth states that
while Ishtar was in "the Land of no Return" that
fertilely in the land of the living ceased. It also states that
"Ea, the King [god of creation and the waters and
life], created Asushunamir [meaning: his appearance is
brilliant]" to help Ishtar which, according to the myth, he
did. Both Ishtar and Tammuz were returned to the land of the
living. This ancient text calls Ishtar, "She who upholds
the great festivals." The myth ends on this wise:
"As for Tammuz, the lover of her [Ishtar's] youth, wash
him with pure water, anoint him with sweet oil: Clothe him with a red
garment. ... On the day when Tammuz comes up to me [Geshtinanna]
... with him the wailing men and wailing women come up to me, may the
dead rise and smell the incense."
[20] According to another myth,
Tammuz and his sister, Geshtinanna, were each required to spend six
months of the year each in "the Land of no Return" with Tammuz
rising of the 1st Tammuz which is 70 days after the Hebrew
Passover.
The Roman Catholic celebration of Lent has no basis in Scripture.
Lent comes directly from this pagan observance of Ishtar, "who
upholds the great festivals" and who weeps for Tammuz. It was
Ishtar who assisted him in his release from "the Land of no
Return" and who negotiated his alternating life of six months in the
land of the living and 6 months in "the Land of no
Return." Lent is the celebration of Semiramis' mourning over
the death of Tammuz (cf. Ezek. 8:14) before his alleged
resurrection. All of this is Satan’s falsification of God
Almighty's prophetic truth concerning the virgin birth of Christ, His
death for our sins, and His resurrection from the dead. These
mythology fabrications built around Semiramis and Tammuz were the first
counterfeit religion, from which all the other false religions have
sprung. Mystery Babylon can be traced directly to Roman Catholicism
which lifts Mary to the position of a goddess. The doctrines of her
ancient daughters include a priesthood, idolatry, purgatory, astrology,
occultism, and even the doctrines of karma and reincarnation for
Semiramis is the supposed reincarnation of Eve, and Tammuz of
Nimrod. Mary worship, purgatory, and the forty day lent before
Easter, etc. are of Mystery Babylon (aka Catholicism) that came to Rome
by way of Pergamos. [14] None of
these things have any connection at all with the Bible, the Lord Jesus
Christ or His church. Lent comes from the pagan practice of forty
days of weeping and self-denial for the resurrection of Tammuz.
Lent was first addressed by the Church at Rome during the Council of
Nicea in A.D. 325. Emperor Constantine began the process of joining
paganism with the Church of Rome, which had already been corrupted, and
establishing the new state religion of the Roman Empire, Roman
Catholicism. The Council of Laodicea in A.D. 360 officially
commanded Lent to be observed. "The forty days' abstinence of
Lent was directly borrowed from the worshippers of the Babylonian
goddess. ... To conciliate the Pagans to nominal Christianity, Rome,
pursuing its usual policy, took measures to get the Christian and Pagan
festivals amalgamated, and, ... in general, to get Paganism and
Christianity--now far sunk in idolatry--in this as in so many other
things, to shake hands." [21]
The Roman Church replaced Passover with Easter and moved the pagan lent
and feast for Tammuz to early spring. However, the "after
Easter" of Herod’s day and that which he spoke of was held on the
first of Tammuz (our June / July time frame).
Therefore, the answer to the question of what was the pesach of Acts 12:4 is this: It was a Pagan counterfeit of the Pesach of God, a festival held on the first of Tammaz in honor of the falsified death and resurrection of Tammaz, who was supposedly the seed of the woman and was assisted in his resurrection by the goddess Ishtar (aka Semiramis). The true Pesach of the LORD or feast of Passover (1 Corinthians 5:7) was a one day feast which was symbolic of the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, the feast of Unleavened Bread was a seven day feast which pointed to the burial of the Lord's sinless body, and the feast of First Fruits was a one day feast picturing Christ's resurrection from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:20-23). Thus the Lord Jesus Christ fulfilled the first part of the prophecy of the Seed of the woman by His heel having been bruised (Genesis 3:15).
As has already been seen the Seed of the woman of Genesis 3:15 was
certainly known to the descendants of Noah. The life of Noah's
grandfather, Methuselah, overlapped Adam's life for over 200 years and
overlapped his own life over 500 years. Adam had learned from God
face to face in Eden before the Fall, and Methuselah was surely taught
the knowledge of Adam by his godly father Enoch, who "walked with
God: and he was not; for God took him" (Gen 5:24). Noah, no
doubt, learned the things of God from his grandfather, Methuselah, and
his father, Lamech. In order for Noah to be "a preacher of
righteousness" (2 Pet 2:5; cf. Gen 6:8) he would have of necessity
had to have known that the Seed of the woman was to be the Saviour of the
world, the sacrificial Lamb and Son of God. Noah would have known
of the bloody sacrifice that God preformed in order to "make coats
of skins, and clothed [Adam and Eve]" (Gen 3:21), and that “the LORD
had respect unto … [Abel’s bloody] offering” (Gen 4:4). He knew
first hand that "the LORD shut him in" the Ark to protect him
from the Great Flood (Gen 7:16). Noah and his family were most
assuredly among those who “[called] upon the name of the LORD” before the
Flood (Gen 4:26). However, when the unregenerate people of the
early post Flood world heard the things of God from Noah, Shem
[22] and others it was then, as it is
today, as foolishness unto them (1 Cor 1:18-21). "But there
were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false
teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even
denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift
destruction." (2 Pet 2:1) From the ancient Chaldee phrase
"Zer-Nebo-Gus" which means "seed of the prophet Cush"
it appears that Cush was a false prophet who prophesied that his son,
Nimrod, was the promised Seed. Shyster false prophets like Cush,
Nimrod and Semiramis easily deceived the people. Therefore, lying
prophecies were told, believed and taken to all parts of the world after
the confusion of Babel. This is the stuff mythology is made of, a
little truth mixed with a lot of lie.
"[He] who by the Chaldeans was regarded as the great
"Seed," was looked upon as the sun incarnate ... The name
Tammuz [Tam = to perfect, Muz = fire] has evidently reference to this,
for it signifies "to perfect," that is, "to purify"
"by fire"; and if Nimrod was, as ... the general voice of
antiquity, represent him to have been, the originator of fire-worship,
this name very exactly expresses his character in that respect."
[23,
24] "Tammuz ... is commonly
known among classical writers under the name of Bacchus, that is, 'The
Lamented one.' ... [It is] well known, that amid all the abominations
that attended [this Lamented one's] orgies, their grand design was
professedly 'the purification of souls,' and that from the
guilt and defilement of sin. ... [A fourth-century AD pagan by the name
of Servius Maurus Honoratus] tells us that the grand purpose of the
Bacchic orgies 'was the purification of souls,' and as in these orgies
there was regularly the tearing asunder and the shedding of the blood of
an animal, in memory of the shedding of the life's blood of the great
divinity commemorated in them. Could this symbolical shedding of
the blood of that divinity have no bearing on the 'purification' from
sin, these mystic rites were intended to effect? ... [The]
sufferings of the Babylonian Zoroaster [Chaldee, Zero = 'the seed' &
Ashta = 'the woman'] and Belus [aka Baal the sun god] were expressly
represented as voluntary, and as submitted to for the benefit of the
world, and that in connection with crushing the great serpent's head,
which implied the removal of sin and the curse."
[25] So it becomes apparent from
piecing together the evidence from ancient history and mythology that the
mystery religions that are still with us today in the form of
Zoroastrism, Hinduism, Catholicism, Islam, Druidism, etc. all have their
origin in a the false god and goddess, Tammuz and Ishtar.
Now to tie all this to Europe and Great Briton in
particular: The Celtic peoples employed the Druids as their
religious guides in France, England and Ireland. One Celtic goddess
in Breton and Gaul was Sirona, again meaning "star."
[5] She was a sky goddess, probably
a deity of the sun and was the goddess of healing and fertility. The
consort of Sirona was Grannus, the Celtic equivalent of the Roman
Apollo. There was also the goddess Belisama who was
connected with lakes and rivers, and fire and light. Belisama was
the consort of Belenus the sun god of the Celts. May 1st is called
Beltane, a Celtic fire festival, held in Bel's honor to celebrate the
life and fertility -- marking the beginning of Summer. Belisama and
Belenus are just Ishtar and Tammaz by other names. Hislop also
connects the Druid form of worship to the Babylonian with the goddess
Ceres: "The Druidic system in all its parts was
evidently the Babylonian system. [The Greek historian] Dionysius [of
Halicarnassus (60 - 7 BC)] informs us, that the rites of Bacchus were
duly celebrated in the British Islands and [the Greek geographer and
historian] Strabo [64 BC - 24 AD] cites [the geographer] Artemidorus [of
Ephesius (2nd century BC)] to show that, in an island close to Britain,
[the goddess] Ceres and [her daughter] Proserpine were venerated with
rites similar to the orgies of [the Greek island of] Samothrace [in the
northern Aegean Sea]. ... [From] the account of the Druidic
Ceridwen and her child ... [we know] that there was a great
analogy between her character and that of the great goddess-mother of
Babylon. Such was the system; and the name Dryw, or Droi, applied to the
priests, is in exact accordance with that system. The name Zero, given in
Hebrew or the early Chaldee, to the son of the great goddess queen, in
later Chaldee became "Dero." The priest of Dero, 'the seed,'
was called, as is the case in almost all religions, by the name of his
god; and hence the familiar name 'Druid' is thus proved to signify the
priest of 'Dero,' the woman's promised 'seed.' ... That the
initiated Pagans actually believed that the 'Corn' which Ceres
bestowed on the world was not the 'Corn' of this earth, but the Divine
'Son,' through whom alone spiritual and eternal life could be enjoyed, we
have clear and decisive proof. The Druids were devoted worshippers of
Ceres, and as such they were celebrated in their mystic poems as 'bearers
of the ears of corn.' Now, the ... [Song of Taliesin,' in Davies'
British Druids gives] the account which the Druids give of their
great divinity, under the form of 'Corn.' That divinity was represented
as having ... assumed the form of a single grain [and was] ...swallowed
[by Ceridwen (Ceres) who had taken] ... the form of a black high-crested
hen ... [and she became] pregnant of him nine months, and when delivered
of him ... she found him so lovely a babe. ... Here it is evident
that the grain of corn, is expressly identified with
'the lovely babe'; from which it is still further evident
that Ceres, who, to the profane vulgar was known only as the Mother of
'Bar,' 'the Corn,' was known to the initiated as the Mother
of 'Bar,' 'the Son.' And now, the reader will be prepared to
understand the full significance of the representation in the Celestial
sphere of 'the Virgin with the ear of wheat in her hand.' That ear of
wheat in the Virgin's hand is just another symbol for the
child in the arms of the Virgin Mother."
[26] However, the name of the
goddess that stuck was not Sirona, Belisama, or
Ceridwen, but was Easter which name, we learned from Bede
(672 - 735 AD), comes from a goddess named Eostre (cognate to the
Greek, Eos; the Latin, Aurora; the Babylonian, Ishtar) and after whom the
month of April was then called, "Eosturmonath."
There are two main things to remember about the "Easter" of
Acts 12:4: 1) It was really was a "pesach"
(a symbol of death for sins and resurrection) festival, although a
falsified mythical one; and 2) that counterfeit
"pesach" which had its beginnings in Babel has a false
seed, multiple saviours, numerous deaths and fabricated
resurrections. The satanic mystery religions that have propagated
this false teaching do not have a single saviour, but add his mother /
wife, the Queen of Heaven, as co-saviour (Acts 4:12; 1 Tim 2:5);
they do not teach the seed's resurrection only, but add his reincarnation
also (Heb 9:27-28); they do not teach a single sacrificial death, but it
is repeated over and over (Heb 10:10; 1 Pet 3:18). The seed of the
woman in the mystery religions simply is not the Seed of the woman of the
Holy Scriptures. The final end time fulfillment of this false seed
will be the Antichrist Beast of Revelation 13, and his Mystery Mother of
Revelation 17.
PETER'S ESCAPE AND HEROD'S RESULTING ANGER :
One final item of evidence, although seemingly circumstantial, from
Acts 12 is this:
"[Herod] killed James the brother of John with the sword.
3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to
take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) 4
And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him
to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after
Easter to bring him forth to the people. ... 6 And when Herod
would have brought him forth, the same night Peter was sleeping between
two soldiers, bound with two chains: and the keepers before the door kept
the prison. 7 And, behold, the angel of the Lord came upon
him, ... saying, Arise up quickly. And his chains fell off from his
hands. 8 ... And he saith unto him, Cast thy garment about
thee, and follow me. 9 And he went out, and followed him.
... 18 Now as soon as it was day, there was no small stir among
the soldiers, what was become of Peter. 19 And when Herod
had sought for him [Peter], and found him not, he examined the keepers,
and commanded that they should be put to death. And he went down
from Judaea to Caesarea, and there abode. 20 And Herod
was highly displeased with them of Tyre and Sidon: but they came with
one accord to him, and, having made Blastus the king's chamberlain their
friend, desired peace; because their country was nourished by the king's
country. 21 And upon a set day Herod, arrayed in royal
apparel, sat upon his throne, and made an oration unto them.
22 And the people gave a shout, saying, It is the voice of a
god, and not of a man. 23 And immediately the angel of
the Lord smote him, because he gave not God the glory: and he was eaten
of worms, and gave up the ghost." (Acts 12:2-4, 6-9, 18-23)
Verses 18 to 23 here toward the end of Acts 12 may, at first glance, seem
unrelated to the issue of the use of the word “Easter” in verse 4,
but it does have a bearing on it. Note from this passage: 1)
Herod puts the guards to death and immediately leaves Judaea for Caesarea
(v. 19), 2) he is extreme displeasure with those of Tyre and
Sidon (v. 20), and 3) that “upon a set day” there in
Pagan Caesarea that King Herod accepted the acclamation of the people
that he had “the voice of a god, and not of a man” (v. 22).
First of all, Herod’s acceptance of praise as a god proves that he was
not a religious Jew as some claim.
Secondly, when the angel of the Lord helped Peter to escape (Acts
12:6-11) it caused Herod to miss a political opportunity to please the
Jews and caused him to loose face among the Jews. Because of this
Herod was very upset, for the text says that he had the guards executed,
and having lost face in Judaea he quickly left for Caesarea, but there he
"was highly displeased with them of Tyre and Sidon,"
major centers of Astarte worship. Why was Herod so "highly
displeased with them of Tyre and Sidon"? Why did those of
Tyre and Sidon come "with one accord" to Herod desiring
peace? Why did they fear loosing Herod's support for their
country? Could the reason for Herod's sore displeasure with
"them of Tyre and Sidon" have been because he felt that
Astarte or "Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians" (1 Kings
11:5) had failed to help him keep Peter until the 1st of Tammuz, so he
could fulfill his political goal of pleasing the Jews by making a
spectacle of Peter? Did the Sidonians fear loosing the support of
Herod because they believed their primary deity was the cause of Herod’s
anger? Herod’s great displeasure with his guards and them of Tyre
and Sidon both seem to stem from the same reason: the missed
opportunity to make political points with the Jews. He held both
responsible for Peter’s escape: Those of Tyre and Sidon because their
goddess, Astarte, in whose honor he was waiting, failed him, and his
guards because it was their responsibility to insure Peters
captivity. The coins below prove that Astarte (i.e. Ishtar / Easter) was
worshiped in Tyre and Sidon before, during and after the time of Herod.
Thirdly, the context of the Greek "pascha" in Acts 12:3-4 shows
us that it could not have been the Hebrew "pecach" of Exodus
12:11, 21, 27, 43, 48, but must rather be a pagan
"pascha." This has already been clearly demonstrated by
showing that the Lord's Passover comes before the Feast of Unleveaned
Bread. But furthermore, the Hebrew root word for "pecach"
(Passover) is "pacach" which is translated "pass
over," "leap," and limp as with a hop (i.e.
"halt" and "lame"). This Hebrew word is only
found seven times in the Bible, three times in the Passover Chapter
(Exodus 12), and twice in episode of Elijah against the 850 false
prophets of the groves [asherah] and of Baal (1 Kings 18).
We have already seen that the asherah were tree idols of Ashtoreth the
goddess of the Zidonians (1 Kings 11:5, 33; 2 Kings 23:13) in
groves. We have also seen that Astarte or Ashtoreth of the
Zidonians, Ishtar of the Accadians, Venus of the Romans, Sirona of the
Celts, and Easter of the Teutons and Anglo Saxons are all one and the
same. The Druids were known as "the priests of the
groves" which is similar to the Biblical "the prophets of the
groves" (1 Kings 18:19). In 1 Kings 18:26 we find these false
prophets doing their "[pacach] upon the altar" as the Druids
may have done in the days of Patrick, that great Scottish missionary to
Ireland. [4]
There are a number of parallels between Acts 12 and 1 Kings 18:
First, we have two evil pagan kings who want to make political points
with their people. Second, the people are against God's man in both
cases. Third, the false prophets conduct a pagan pacach for Asherah
and Baal. Forth, God's man is the winner in both cases.
Fifth, the location of Herod's retreat, to Caesarea, was very close to
Mount Carmel (only about 20 miles) where the false prophets conducted
their pacach. 1 Kings 18 is a picture or type of the events of Acts
12. We read of "the prophets of the groves" in 1 Kings
18:17-29:
"And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him,
Art thou he that troubleth Israel? 18 And he answered,
I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy fathers house, in that ye
have forsaken the commandments of the LORD, and thou hast followed
Baalim. 19 Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel
unto mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and
the prophets of the groves [asherah] four hundred, which
eat at Jezebels table. 20 So Ahab sent unto all the children of
Israel, and gathered the prophets together unto mount Carmel. 21
And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt
[pacach] ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God,
follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not
a word. 22 Then said Elijah unto the people, I, even I only,
remain a prophet of the LORD; but Baals prophets are four hundred and
fifty men. 23 Let them therefore give us two bullocks; and
let them choose one bullock for themselves, and cut it in pieces, and lay
it on wood, and put no fire under: and I will dress the other bullock,
and lay it on wood, and put no fire under: 24 And call ye on
the name of your gods, and I will call on the name of the LORD: and the
God that answereth by fire, let him be God. And all the people answered
and said, It is well spoken. 25 And Elijah said unto the
prophets of Baal, Choose you one bullock for yourselves, and dress it
first; for ye are many; and call on the name of your gods, but put no
fire under. 26 And they took the bullock which was
given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from
morning even until noon, saying, O Baal, hear us. But there was no voice,
nor any that answered. And they leaped [pacach]
upon the altar which was made. 27 And it came to pass at
noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god;
either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or
peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked. 28 And they
cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and
lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them. 29 And it came
to pass, when midday was past, and they prophesied until the time of the
offering of the evening sacrifice, that there was neither voice, nor any
to answer, nor any that regarded."
BIBLE BELIEVING SCHOLARS AGREE :
Dr. Samuel Gipp states, "Even though the Jewish passover
was held in [the Hebrew month of Abib (our March / April time frame)] ...
and the pagan festival Easter was held later ..., how do we know that
Herod was referring to Easter in Acts 12:4 and not the Jewish
passover? If he was referring to the passover, the translation of
'pascha' as 'Easter' is incorrect. If he was indeed referring to
the pagan holiday Easter, then the King James Bible (1611) must truly be
the very Word of God for it is the only Bible in print today which has
the correct reading." [27]
Dr. Thomas Strouse says, "The NASV gives the impossible and
therefore inaccurate rendering 'Passover' in Acts 12:4. According to
Scripture, Herod killed the Apostle James and intended to kill Peter,
whom he had captured during the days of the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
After the pasca (NASV 'Passover;' KJB 'Easter') Herod planned to kill
Peter. The OT declared the order of events for the Passover and the Feast
of Unleavened Bread, requiring that the Passover fell on the 14th day of
Nisan and the Feast of Unleavened Bread followed on the 15th through 21st
days of Nisan (Lev. 23:5-6; cf. Ex. 12:3 ff.). Luke could not
possibly be referring to the Passover following the Feast of Unleavened
Bread, contrary to the dictates of the OT and context, but must be
referring to Herod's 'Easter' (Ishtar worship) holy day. Passover is a
translational error in the NASV, NIV, RSV, and NKJV."
[28]
To this Dr. Thomas Holland agrees where he says, "the
context [of Acts 12] would confirm such a conclusion. Verse three of this
chapter states that Peter was taken during, 'the days of unleavened
bread.' The next verse then speaks of 'Easter' in the King James
Version. If the word is translated as "Passover," we have
a problem because the Days of Unleavened Bread come before the Passover.
In the Biblical use of the term, Passover came before the Days of
Unleavened Bread (Exodus 12:1-8, 15, 19; 13:7; Leviticus 2:11; and
Deuteronomy 16:4). We have a problem with these verses if Passover
follows the Days of Unleavened Bread. However, the problem is solved when
we see that 'pascha' means more than 'Passover' . ... Peter was held
under Roman guard by a king who was appointed by Roman law and influenced
by Roman customs. Contextually, it would seem that this 'pascha' which
followed the Days of Unleavened Bread was not the 'pascha' (Passover)
which preceded the capture of Peter. Instead, it ... refer[s] to
the ... celebration of Ostara, hence called 'Easter'."
[29] (Ostara, according to Jakob Grimm
in his Deutsche Mythologie, is the old High German name for the
Easter festival. It is a plural. Grimm states that this is because
the old festival lasted several days. A rough translation would be
"The Easters.")
CONCLUSION :
In 1526 William Tyndale translated "pascha" into English by
using the word "ester," because it was the ancient name of the
month in which Passover fell. About a thousand years before that
this name of a Saxon / Teutonic / Roman goddess had been adopted by the
Roman Catholics and forced on the believers in Britain as having
something to do with the resurrection of Christ. Nonetheless, in
Tyndale's day it was a term accepted for the time of Passover.
Tyndale, however, clearly differentiated the Pagan Easter from the Lord's
Passover in his translation with phrases like "esterlambe"
(Matt 26:19) and "the Iewes ester" (John 11:55), etc., and kept
"paschall lambe" (Matt 26:17; John 18:28) as a reference
point. It is important to note that he later coined a new word,
"passover," for his translation of the Old Testament, although
he never got around to revising the word in his New Testament. He most
likely invented this new word because he saw the pagan connotation of the
word "ester" which only designated the season.
In Tyndale's time he could legitimately use "ester" while God
was preparing the English language for the 1611 translators, and then the
word was expunged everywhere except in Acts 12:4 were it belongs. Thanks
to God and his servant William Tyndale we now have in the English
language both the word "Passover" and an etymological link to
the true meaning of the word "Easter" found in Acts 12:4.
He first used the word "ester" for Pashca in 1526 in his New
Testament. Then in 1530 he coined the literal translation,
"Passover," for his Old Testament using it in every place
Pashca occurred. Then only 85 years later the only place
"easter" was left was in Acts 12:4. Tyndale's work paved
the way for our perfect King James Bible.
At least some of the 46 King James translators recognized the dilemma of
making the Pashca of Acts 12:4 mean "the LORD'S Passover" (Ex
12:11, 27; Lev 23:5) because the context shows that they were already in
"the days of unleavened bread" (Acts 12:3) which come after
Passover. Realizing that it could not be the Passover prescribed in
Exodus 12 they let Easter stand in that one place.
And we know for a fact, regardless of the propaganda of the Catholic and
their sympathizes, that paganism has taken refuge in their Mystery
Babylon. Roman Catholicism goes hand in glove with the
doctrines of ancient Babylon that came to Rome via Pergamos where
"Satan's seat" was (Rev 2:12-13). Likewise we know without
question that Easter was a pagan goddess worshiped in Rome, Germany,
France and England. In England from Bede who
said: "Eosturmonath [our April] has a name which
is now translated 'Paschal month', and which was once called after a
goddess of theirs named Eostre [Eos, Ostara], in whose honour feasts were
celebrated in that month. Now they designate that Paschal season by her
name, calling the joys of the new rite by the time-honoured name of the
old observance." [3]
Originally, as we have seen, the occurrence of pagan Easter was used as
general time reference so the people could relate to Passover. This is
reflected in English Bibles prior to the KJV that used the Roman Catholic
/ Teutonic term "Easter" [30]
to refer to the time of Passover / Resurrection.
To those who would have us believe that "Easter" is
merely synonymous with God's Pesach or Passover, I say
nonsense. It has become synonymous in the minds of most, but
it is not Biblically synonymous as has been proven here. A fake
passover it truly is, but it is not God's holy Passover. It is
Easter and her name is synonymous with Ishtar who assisted a false christ
by the name of Tammuz in his false resurrection. The names
Easter and Ishtar both have the same meaning (a star) as also do
Ashtaroth, Astarte, Isis, Venus, Sirona, Aurora, Eos, Eostre, etc.
They were all fertility and great mother goddesses. Gods and
goddesses have multiplied out from Babel into all the world like
rabbits. There are literally scores of mother and child, and
husband and wife gods and goddesses that had their beginnings in Ishtar
(Semiramis) and Tammuz (Nimrod). When it hops like a rabbit and
reproduces like a rabbit, it’s a rabbit. Easter is a leavened
passover that need to be purged from the hearts of believers.
“Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are
unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore
let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of
malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and
truth.” (1 Cor 5:7-8)
END NOTES :
1. The Layman's Bible Encyclopedia, Nashville, TN, The
Southwestern Company, 1964, p. 204.
2. Brown, T. H.,
After Easter, Trinitarian Bible Society, London, England.
3. Bede,
On the Reckoning of
Time, Chapter XV (The English Months).
4.
Wylie,
James Aitken,
History of the
Scottish Nation,
Vol. I,
Chap. 11,
Hamilton, Adams, & Co., London, 1886. NOTE: Wylie also
writes concerning the pagan Druid priests and their groves in Ireland in
the days of the Baptist missionary, Patrick (4th century AD): "They
greet the missionary with clamour and scowls. Undismayed, Patrick rises
up before them, and amid the gaping wonder of some, the rude mocking of
others, and the silence of a few, proceeds to unfold his message. He does
not directly attack the rites of the groves. He must first show
them a better altar and a holier sacrifice than that of the Druid, and
then they will forsake their bloody oblations of their own accord. He
speaks to them of a God whom they have not seen, for He dwells in the
heavens, but the workings of whose power, and the tokens of whose love,
are all around them. Can He who spread out the plains of earth, who decks
them with the flowers of spring, and waters them with the rain of the
clouds, and clothes them year by year with bounteous harvests, take
delight in the cruel sacrifices you offer to him in the dark wood?
So far from demanding the immolation of your innocent offspring, He has
sent His own son to die in your room. Other sacrifice He does not demand
and will not accept. ... The fear of Patrick had already fallen upon
the priests of the old religion. This helped to open his way into
the land. In the footsteps of the missionary the priests of the
groves heard the knell of the downfall of Druidism. 'Who is this,' we
hear then say, as they turned on one another pale faces, and spoke in
trembling accents, 'who is this who marches through the land casting down
the altars of the country's faith, and withdrawing the hearts of the
people from their fathers' gods?' ... The king remained
unconverted, but the queen and her two daughters transferred their faith
from the altars of the groves to the Cross of Calvary. ... In
numerous instances, doubtless, the oak groves of the Druid were
given to the axe, and the dolmen and stone pillar lay overturned and
broken by the hammer of the iconoclast. But not in all cases. In some
localities these objects of idolatrous reverence were spared, and became
snares and causes of stumbling to the converts." (Wylie, James
Aitken, History of the
Scottish Nation,
Vol. II,
Chapters 15,
16 &
18)
5. Goddesses whose name mean star: 1)
Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5, 33; 2 Kings 23:13), consort of Baal, was
the principal female divinity of the Phoenicians and the goddess of
Jezebel who in a prophetic figure teaches and seduces Gods people to
commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols (Rev 2:20).
Ashtoreth is cognate with Ashtaroth, the fertility goddesses of the
Canaanites (Judges 2:13, Judges10:6; 1 Samuel 7:3-4, 12:10). 2)
Ishtar, consort and
mother of Tammuz (Ezek 8:14). 3)
Inanna was the
consort of Dumuzi. She was the first known divinity associated with
Venus. She is the original "holy virgin," as the
Sumerians called her. Inanna is identified with the Semitic
goddesses Ishtar and later Astarte, the Egyptian Isis, the Greek
Aphrodite, the Etruscan Turan, and the Roman Venus. 4)
Astarte is
cognate in name, origin and functions with Ishtar. She was first
known as Ashtart in Egypt over 3300 years ago, and known as Astarte by
the Greeks and Romans. Inanna was identified with both the moon and the
planet Venus. Astarte was worshiped with the most impure
rites. 5)
Venus
, the consort of Vulcan, was a major Roman goddess principally associated
with love and beauty. She was the rough equivalent of the Greek
goddess Aphrodite, although she was far more powerful and revered than
Aphrodite. Venus represented impure love, and was the patron
goddess of prostitutes. She played a key role in many Roman
religious festivals. 6)
Aphrodite was
the Greek goddess of love, lust, beauty, and sexuality. She has numerous
equivalents: Inanna, Ishtar, Astarte, Turan and Venus. Aphrodite also has
parallels to dawn goddesses such as Ushas, Aurora and Eos. 7)
Sirona was a Celtic
goddess widely worshipped in east-central Gaul. She was particularly
revered by the Treveri in the Moselle Valley. A healing deity, she was
associated with healing springs. Her symbols were snakes and eggs.
She was sometimes depicted with Apollo. The root is Gaulish “ster”
meaning a star. The same root is found in Old Irish and Welsh as ser,
Middle Cornish as steyr and Breton as ster. The name combines the
root “ster” with the “ona” which is Gaulish for a feminine singular.
8) Eos, the Greek
goddess of the dawn, is the wife of Astraeus (Starry; an astrological
deity) and others. Her sons include the five Astra Planeta
(planets), and all the stars. Eos is referred to by Homer (8th century
BC) in the Iliad and Odyssey. 9)
Eostre or Easter is
the same as Eos, Venus and Sirona. Eostre and Ostara are derived from the
Old Teutonic root which means "illuminate, especially of
daybreak" and closely related to the word for "the dawn star
Venus." The ancient month Eosturmonath (around April) was
named after Eostre who was honour with feasts in that month. Ostara is a
plural referring to the old High German festival of several days in honor
of the goddess.
6. Hislop,
Alexander, The Two
Babylons, Loizeaux Brothers, Neptune, NJ, 1910, pp. 103 - 105,
107. NOTE: We strongly disagree with Alexander Hislop's
statement on page 104 of The Two Babylons where he says,
"Every one knows that the name 'Easter,' used in our translation
of Acts 12:4, refers not to any Christian festival, but to the
Jewish Passover. This is one of the few places in our version where the
translators show an undue bias." The Authorized Version
(KJV) of the Bible is the inspired, infallible, preserved Word of God in
English. Hislop clearly had not considered the implications of that
absurd statement. (Plus the name “Easter” used there is neither a
Christian festival, nor the Jewish Passover.) However, he completed
The Two Babylons in 1858 long before Bible translations
became a well studied issue. Although wrong on this essential
doctrine, he gives a strong testimony on pages 70 & 71,
"Since sin entered the world there has been only one way of
salvation, and that through the blood of the everlasting covenant--a way
that all mankind once knew, from the days of righteous Abel downwards.
When Abel, 'by faith,' offered unto God his more excellent sacrifice than
that of Cain, it was his faith 'in the blood of the Lamb slain,' in the
purpose of God 'from the foundation of the world,' and in due time to be
actually offered up on Calvary, that gave all the 'excellence' to his
offering." From this we conclude that he was saved, and
his book, The Two Babylons, wages good warfare against the
"The Mother of Harlots," although he did not recognize all the
implications of his studies of her background. His book has 2 main
premises: 1) The ancient Pagan systems of worship were based on mystery
religions and that had their beginning in Babel. 2) That the Roman
Catholic Church (which began around 313 AD) appropriated the Pagan
mysteries from Babylon via Pergamos, and assimilated the doctrines of
other mystery religions which had permeated the world. Both
premises are sound and Hislops scholarship although not impeccable is
also good.
7. Davis Dictionary of the Bible, p. 319 under "Herod the
King," Royal Publishers, Inc.,1973. (Also see:
Josephus,
Antiquities,
XVIII,
XIX & War
II).
8. Caesarea Maritima was founded by Straton I of Sidon who
reigned from 376 to 361 BC, and it was rebuilt by Agrippa’s grandfather
Herod the Great around 25 - 13 BC.
9. Jewish
Encyclopedia, 1906, under
"Caesarea."
10. Migne edition of Jerome's works, vol. XXV, col. 82.
NOTE: Jerome, who spent a large part of his life in Palestine,
also confirms that the Pagan Romans tried to change the truth of Christ
into a lie: "From the time of Hadrian to the reign of
Constantine, a period of about one hundred and eighty years, the spot
which had witnessed the resurrection was occupied by a figure of Jupiter;
while on the rock where the cross had stood, a marble statue of Venus was
set up by the heathen and became an object of worship. The original
persecutors, indeed, supposed that by polluting our holy places they
would deprive us of our faith in the passion and in the resurrection.
Even my own Bethlehem, as it now is, that most venerable spot in the
whole world of which the psalmist sings: 'the truth hath sprung out of
the earth,' [Ps. lxxxv. 11, Vulg.], was overshadowed by a grove of
Tammuz, that is of Adonis; and in the very cave where the infant Christ
had uttered His earliest cry lamentation was made for the paramour of
Venus."
(Jerome's
Epistle to Paulinus Translated by Henry Fremantle, 1893)
11. Hislop, p. 105
12. Hislop, p. 62
13. Moshe ben
Maimon or Moses Maimonides (1135 -1204 AD) was a Jewish rabbi,
physician, and philosopher in Spain and Egypt. His philosophy also
influenced the non-Jewish world. Although his copious works on
Jewish law and ethics were initially met with opposition during his
lifetime, he was posthumously acknowledged to be one of the foremost
rabbinical arbiters and philosophers in Jewish history. Today, his works
and his views are considered a cornerstone of Orthodox Jewish thought and
study.
14. The Babylon, Pergamos, Rome connections: “Cyrus, Xerxes,
and many of the Medo-Persian kings, banished [the Queen of Heaven's]
priests from Babylon, and labored to root it out of their empire; but
then it found a secure retreat in Pergamos, and Satans seat was erected
there [Revelation 2:12-13]. The glory of Pergamos and the cities of
Asia Monor departed; but the worship of the Queen of Heaven did not
wane. It took a higher flight, and seated itself on the throne of
Imperial Rome. That throne was subverted. The Arian Goths
came burning with fury against the worshippers of the Virgin Queen; but
still that worship rose buoyant above all attempts to put it down, and
the Arian Goths themselves were soon prostrate at the feet of the
Babylonian goddess, seated in glory on the seven hills of Rome.” (Hislop,
p 288) The true legitimate Babylonian Pontiff after the death of
Belshazzar [539 B.C.], and the expulsion of the Chaldean priesthood from
Babylon by the Medo-Persian kings was at Pergamos, where afterwards was
one of the seven churches of Asia There under favor of the deified kings
of Pergamos was [Satans] favorite abode, there was the worship of
Aesculapius, under the form of the serpent, celebrated with frantic
orgies and excesses At first, the Roman Pontiff had no immediate
connection with Pergamos and the hierarchy there; yet, in course of
time, the Pontificate of Rome and the Pontificate of Pergamos came to be
identified. Pergamos itself became part and parcel of the Roman
Empire, when Attalus III, the last of its kings, at his death, left by
will all his dominion to the Roman people in 133 B.C. For some time
after there was no one who could lay claim to all the dignity inherent in
the old title of the kings of Pergamos [until] Julius Caesar, who had
previously been elected Pontifex Maximus, became also, as Emperor, the
supreme civil ruler of the Romans [46-44 B.C.], then as head of the Roman
state, and head of the Roman religion, all the powers and functions of
the true legitimate Babylonian Pontiff were supremely vested in
him, and he found himself in a position to assert these powers. Then on
certain occasions, in the exercise of his high pontifical office, he
appeared of course in all the pomp of the Babylonian costume, as
Belshazzar [and Attalus] might have done, in robes of scarlet, with the
crosier of Nimrod in his hand, wearing the miter of the Dragon and
bearing the keys of Janus and Cybele. Thus did matters continue
even under so-called Christian emperors [beginning with Constantine
(306-337 AD)] until the reign of Gratian [375 - 383 AD], who was
the first that refused to be arrayed in the idolatrous pontifical attire,
or to act as Pontifex. ... Gratian abolished the legal provision for the
support of fire-worship and serpent-worship of Rome ...” (Hislop, pp.
240, 241, 242, 280) "... [In] Rome ... Teitan, or Satan, [was]
identified with the 'serpent that taught mankind,' that opened their eyes
(when, of course, they were blind), and gave them 'the knowledge of good
and evil.' In Pergamos, and in all Asia Minor, from which directly
Rome derived its knowledge of the Mysteries, the case was the same. In
Pergamos, especially, where pre-eminently Satans seat was [Revelation
2:12-13], the sun-divinity, as is well known, was worshipped under the
form of a serpent and under the name of Aesculapius, "the
man-instructing serpent." According to the fundamental doctrine of
the Mysteries, as brought from Pergamos to Rome, the sun was the one only
god. Teitan, or Satan, then, was thus recognised as the one only god; and
of that only god, Tammuz or Janus, in his character as the Son, or the
woman's seed, was just an incarnation. Here, then, the grand secret of
the Roman Empire is at last brought to light--viz., the real name of the
tutelar divinity of Rome." (Hislop, p. 279) Approximately 64
years before the Western Roman Empire came to an end in 476 AD, the
leader of the Church in Rome, Bishop Leo, assumed the defunct title of
Pontifex Maximus in 412 A.D. Out of the ruins of the Western Roman
Empire arose the Papal Empire, and Rome still ruled the world. [Halley,
Henry H., Halleys Bible Handbook, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI, 1927, p.
759 & Eerdmans Handbook to the Worlds Religions, p.
112]
15. Morris, Henry M, The Genesis Record, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids,
MI, 1976, p. 252.
16. Hislop, p. 305.
17. Salverte, Eusbe, Des Sciences Occultes, Appendex, Note A sect. xii.
p. 409, Paris, Sdillot, Libraire-Editeur, 1829
18. Semiramis according to Diodorus: The Greek Historian,
Diodorus
Siculus (90-30 BC) relates the myth that Semiramis was the daughter
of "a famous goddess called by the Syrians Derceto" [aka.
Atargatis, Ashtoreth, Astarte, Ishtar], and a young man who had been
sacrificing to her. Diodorus further writes: "When [Ninus, aka
Nimrod] had finished his work [of building Neneveh], he marched with an
army against the Bactrians where he married Semiramis; who being so
famous above any of her sex, [and] ... exceeding all others of her sex
for the charms of her beauty. ... [Ninus] had a son by Semiramis, called
Ninyas, and died, leaving his wife queen regent. ... Afterwards ... she
went to the temple of Jupiter Ammon, and there inquired of the oracle how
long she should lives which returned her this answer, That she should
leave this world, and afterwards be forever honored by some nations in
Asia, when Ninyas her son should be plotting against her. ... Semiramis
being assaulted ... through the treacherous contrivance of her son,
remembered the former answer given her by the oracle at the temple of
Ammon, and therefore passed the business over without punishing of him
who was chiefly concerned in the plot: but surrendering the crown to him,
commanded all to obey him as their lawful king, and forthwith
disappeared, as if she had been translated to the gods, according to the
words of the oracle. There are some which fabulously say she was
metamorphosed into a pigeon, and that she flew away with a flock of those
birds that lighted upon her palace: and hence it is that the Assyrians
adore a dove, believing that Semiramis was enthroned amongst the
gods. And this was the end of Semiramis, queen of all Asia, except
India. ... Semiramis [also] ... built the city of Babylon ..."
(Diodorus Siculus'
Historical Library translated by G Booth, 1814; Book II, pp. 102,
103, 105,111, 116, 151)
19. Hislop, pp. 5, 21.
20.
The Descent of Ishtar, Translation by E. A. Speiser, Ancient
Near Eastern Texts (Princeton, 1950), pp. 106-109; Notes from reprint
by Isaac Mendelsohn, Religions of the Ancient Near East, Library
of Religion paperbook series (New York, 1955), pp. 119-125.
21. Hislop, pp. 104, 105.
22. Shem vs. Tammuz: "It was Typhon, according to the Pagan
version of the story, that killed Tammuz, and cut him in pieces. ...
[However,] Shem was the actual slayer of Tammuz. As the grand
adversary of the Pagan Messiah, those who hated him for his deed called
him for that very deed by the name of the Grand Adversary of all, Typhon,
or the Devil [Matt 10:25]. ... In the Myster[y religions] ... Tammuz was
worshipped as the bruiser of the serpent's head, meaning thereby that he
was the appointed destroyer of Satan's kingdom." (Hislop pp. 276,
277)
23. Hislop, pp. 18, 315.
24. Tammuz (Tam = to make perfect, Muz = fire): Tammuz
is the Accadian sun-god, the son / husband of the goddess Ishtar.
In the Chaldean calendar the month of Tammuz is set apart in honor of
this false god at the beginning of the summer solstice. At his
festival, which lasted six days, the worshippers, with loud lamentations,
bewailed the funeral of the god. They sat "weeping for
Tammuz" (Ezek 8:14). The Hebrew calendar borrowed the name from
Chaldean for it's month that corresponds to our June / July. The
examination of the meaning of the name Tammuz confirms the connection of
Nimrod with the first fire-worship. Also the Chaldeans were the first who
introduced the name and power of kings (Syncellus), and as Nimrod was
unquestionably the first of these kings, and the first, consequently,
that bore the title of Moloch which means king, so it was in honor of him
that the "children were made to pass through the fire to
Moloch." But the intention of that passing through the fire
was to purify. The name Tammuz has evidently reference to this, for it
signifies "to perfect," that is, "to purify by fire."
The general voice of antiquity represent Nimrod to have been the
originator of fire-worship, this name of Tammuz very exactly expresses
his character in that respect. (Hislop p. 315)
25. Hislop, pp. 21, 22, 71.
26. Hislop pp. 81, 161.
27. Gipp, Samuel,
The Answer
Book, Chap
2, Shelbyville, TN, Bible and Literature Missionary Foundation,
1989.
28. Strouse, Thomas,
Should Fundamentalists Use The NASV?, Sound Words from New England,
Vol. 2. Issue 1, June-August 2001, Emmanuel Baptist Theological Seminary,
Newington, CT.
29. Holland, Thomas,
King James
Manuscript Evidence, Lesson 11.
30. Easter: Eostre and Ostara are derived from the Old Teutonic
root 'aew-s', 'illuminate, especially of daybreak' and closely related to
awes-ter- 'dawn servant', the dawn star Venus. The only known
linguist link to Eostre in Old Norse is pointed out by Jacob Grimm who
speculates that the "spirit of light" named Austri [eastern] is
referred to in the Poetic Edda preserved in Codex Regius. Note that Bede
appears to have Latinized the name of the second month from English Sun
or Sunna to Sol (perhaps for the benefit of his Latin readers). He seems
to have done the same sort of thing with the goddess and her fourth month
festival (English Estre or Eastre into Eostre/Eostur).
31. Funk and Wagnall's Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and
Legend, Vol. 1, 1949; and Frazer, James G.,
The
Golden Bough, Vol. 12, 3rd Edition, 1915; and Woodrow,
Ralph, Babylon Mystery Religion, Riverside, California: Ralph Woodrow
Evangelistic Assn., 1966, pp. 152, 153.